Facial Scanners are Obsolete in Digital MFP, here's why..
- vaatsalyainventure
- Sep 29
- 2 min read

Facial scanners are transforming prosthodontics—especially maxillofacial prosthodontics and smile design—by enabling precise, patient-specific planning.
But, when comparing dedicated facial scanners to mobile phone-based 3D scanning apps (like Bellus3D, FaceScan, or iPhone’s TrueDepth-based workflows), there are obvious disadvantages of facial scanners relative to mobile phone scanners in prosthodontics and maxillofacial applications
In comparison to most widely used methods of data acquisition, Facial scanners outshine others in accuracy and fidelity, but at what Return on investment?
See for yourself,
Feature | Facial Scanner | Mobile App Scanner | CT Scan | MRI |
Surface Detail Accuracy | High-resolution 3D surface capture | Moderate; depends on phone hardware | Poor; not designed for surface anatomy | |
Internal Anatomy Visualization | ❌ Not available | ❌ Not available | ✅ Excellent for bone, teeth, implants | ✅ Excellent for soft tissue, nerves, muscles |
Soft Tissue Dynamics | Limited (static scan) | Limited (static scan) | ❌ Not captured | ✅ Can capture functional movement (advanced MRI) |
Radiation Exposure | ❌ None | ❌ None | ⚠️ Yes (ionizing radiation) | ❌ None |
Scan Time | Fast (seconds to minutes) | Very fast (seconds) | Moderate (minutes) | Long (15–45 minutes) |
Cost & Accessibility | High cost, clinic-based | Low cost, highly accessible | Moderate to high; requires imaging center | High; limited availability |
Portability | ❌ Not portable | ✅ Highly portable | ❌ Not portable | ❌ Not portable |
Integration with CAD/CAM | ✅ Seamless | ✅ With some apps | ✅ Widely supported | ⚠️ Complex; limited support |
Use in Smile Design | ✅ Excellent for esthetics | ✅ Good for preliminary visualization | ⚠️ Limited; lacks surface realism | ❌ Not suitable for esthetic planning |
Use in Maxillofacial Prosthetics | ✅ Ideal for external anatomy | ⚠️ Limited; good for outreach | ✅ Ideal for skeletal modeling | ✅ Ideal for soft tissue modeling |
Best Use Case | High-fidelity esthetic & prosthetic planning | Outreach, patient education, quick scans | Implant planning, bone modeling, surgical guides | Soft tissue modeling, palliative or dynamic cases |
Facial scanners are revolutionizing prosthodontics—especially smile design and maxillofacial rehab—by enabling precise, patient-specific planning. They allow virtual patient creation, esthetic alignment, and custom prosthesis design with rapid, non-invasive workflows. Compared to mobile 3D apps (like Bellus3D or TrueDepth), dedicated scanners offer superior accuracy but are costlier, less portable, and require training. CT scans provide deep anatomical insight for surgical planning but lack surface detail and involve radiation. MRI excels in soft tissue visualization and dynamic imaging, ideal for palliative or post-oncologic prosthetics, though it’s slower and less bone-reliable. For economically viable, high-fidelity prosthetics, a hybrid workflow—CT for internal anatomy, mobile scans for esthetics, and MRI for soft tissue—offers the best fusion for functionally adaptive, patient-specific outcomes.
For information on V-Invent Max-fac Prostheses Devices like Shade-guide, Silicon, Stains kit, Adhesives and Digital MFP Services please visit Max-fac Prostheses section on our website https://www.vinvent.in/
Thanks for reading,
Dr. Abhishek Nagaraj




Comments